| Kent Newsome on technology, music and life | |||||
![]() HereElsewhereSubscribeVia RSSVia FriendFeed
Via EmailMy RadioPandoraShop(@ Amazon.Com)ArchivesSearchDISCLOSURE:
|
![]() |
2/11/2006About SEO
I don't know much about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), other than what I read at Wikipedia. But I was thinking about it some earlier today when visiting Ziggs in connection with my current Web 2.0 Wars series (I have written through Round 9, but only published through Round 4).
Mostly I know that I get spam pretty regularly from companies who tell me that for money they can move my page to the top of the search engine rankings. I always wonder for what keyword(s)? Could I pay some money and be the top site for break dancing? What about mockingbirds, or maybe break dancing mockingbirds? If so, should I or is using SEO sort of like those jackasses who go to the front of the line at lane merges- an unfair shortcut that clogs progess for the rest of us? Honestly, I don't know. Maybe someone can educate me on this. Without thinking much about it, I have generally felt that it was an unfair shortcut, but maybe I'm missing the boat on this. I have also felt that SEO may be yet another situation where the prospect of a dollar gets in the way of fairness and good sense. Anyway, a while ago, I came across this post from Matt Cutts, who seems to be someone of importance at Google. It's hard to tell since his blog has nothing even remotely resembling an "About" link. But I digress. Matt is confirming that Google has put some outfit called Traffic Power in the penalty box by removing it and certain domains promoted by it from Google's index. Matt says some of its SEO techniques violated Google's guidelines. Again, I know virtually nothing about this entire business, but it seems to me that there is great potential for abuse when it comes to selling higher search engine rankings. It also seems to me that if the goal is to be at the top of the search engine rankings, you're approaching the issue backwards. It should be important that the search engines find the most relevant information, not the other way around. I can understand how improved design, css and meta descriptions could result in a better search engine ranking, but isn't that really about web design as opposed to the "better credit in 30 days" vibe that I get when I read about SEO? Someone please explain to me what legitimate SEO is and why it's not an unfair shortcut. Tags:
Share: Digg | Email | Facebook | FriendFeed | Propeller | Reddit | Stumble Upon Bookmark: Del.icio.us | Furl | Ma.gnolia Reactions: 3 Comments | Post a Comment | Inbound Links 3 Comment(s):
Well think of SEO as just another way to try to get targeted traffic and have your voice heard.
By , at
2/12/2006 11:18 AM
It's not an unfair shortcut, as the information is freely availible on the Web. Paying a legitimate SEO company, just ensures that you have someone who has really studied on this, to help you out.
By Eric Scalf, at
2/13/2006 12:21 AM
Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of streamlining components of your website for optimal search engine performance. Just like a machine that does not require extra moving parts, certain elements of your website may be working against you. SEO helps to ensure that a site is accessible to a search engine and improves the chances that the site will be found by the search engine. Search engines are getting smarter every day. Effective search engine optimization is a matter of staying on top of the search engines secrets, often as changes are being implemented for the very first time.
By crystal, at
11/20/2008 12:18 AM
|
![]() |
ListenRead |
|
DISCLAIMER
Newsome.Org, Kent's blog and the related pages and content are solely the thoughts and opinions of Kent Newsome in his personal capacity and are not associated with any other person or entity, including, without limitation, any partnership or other business entity Kent may now or hereafter be associated with. |
|||||





