Blogs are Really Just Better Homepages

I think Rex Hammock nailed it the other day when he said:

When you set up a weblog, don’t think of it as launching a “publication” or any other “mass media” and don’t measure success in terms of “size of audience.” Think of it simply as having a place on the web to easily post messages, photos and other digital files. Think of it as having something like email, but you don’t send it out — however, your friends or associates can “subscribe” to it, if they want to. Don’t make this too complicated.

Many of us, myself included, are inclined to think about blogs as being more revolutionary than they really are. Yes, I write about how a blog is really just an online diary, etc. And most of the time I remember that. But then my erector-set personality fools my brain into thinking that all this blogging stuff is some new creation that is rapidly shifting all of our paradigms.

The fact is that blogs are changing things, primarily by making it easier to do what we’ve been trying to do all along. We wanted to have distributed, archivable conversations with people all over the world back in the nineties. The problem was that we didn’t have today’s blogging platforms to help publish and manage our content.

Blogs are really just a technological advance in the personal web page. They make it easier for us oldtimers to manage our content and they lower the technological barrier to entry, which gives more people a place at the table. Good, yes. World changing, not really.

Look at what Newsome.Org looked like back in 1999 (ignore the date near the top, that’s some code that continues to do its job). See the “Latest News” in the middle column? That’s a primitive Perl based predecessor to a blogging platform. I didn’t call it blogging back then, but that’s what I and countless others were doing. We just didn’t know it.

Note the empty box in the right hand column where the Chat Room used to be? 2006 so far is the year of the blog-based chat room. But we had them back in 1999.

See the classified ads link in the left hand column. Again, primitive and Perl-based, but we had them way back then.

Scott Karp gets it too:

So what is a blog? It’s a content management and publishing platform. All online publishers use a content management and publishing platform. The difference with blogging software is that it doesn’t come with the huge price tag.

Blogs are just a better and easier way to do what we were doing back then.

And we didn’t even know it.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Mathew Ingram
    Totally right, Kent. And I notice from the fine print on your old page that you made the front of Money magazine in 1999, and your portfolio was up 40% at that point. I hope you didn't lose it all when the bubble burst like I did :-) I didn't make the front of Money, but my financial website (which no longer exists) was "Site of the Day" in Worth magazine in 1996. Everything old is new again.
  • Sadly, I lost a lot of it in the first dot.com bust.

    Even more sadly, the company that had signed an agreement to buy ACCBoards.Com for go to the house money went under.

    Good times, bad times.



  • Kent, I have to admit your analysis is correct. As much as I'd like for blogs to be more "world-changing", it is really the individuals with the ideas and the desire to share knowledge. Modern blogs are just a tool to get it done - CMS for the masses if you will.
  • Man you're again so right. I had a personal webpage up in 1997. 1997!!! And I was pretty much doing the same thing I'm doing with my blog-- except I was doing it ALL BY MYSELF. Now I just post, publish, lather, rinse and repeat. It's easy. And thank goodness, because doggone it if life didn't get a whole heckuva lot harder.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Photo Gallery