<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design, RSS and Internet Explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/design-rss-and-internet-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/design-rss-and-internet-explorer/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/design-rss-and-internet-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-4902</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2710#comment-4902</guid>
		<description>Not sure if this is helpful, but I rarely look at my stats. &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://doc.weblogs.com/discuss/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Says here&lt;/A&gt; my blog gets somewhere betwen 1500 and 4000 reads a day, stronger in midweek, weaker on weekends. It&#039;s had numbers in that range since 2000. I&#039;m told there are another 1500 who are subscribers, but ... I dunno. I&#039;m not even sure how to check.Also, I don&#039;t subscribe to blogs in my aggregator. I subscribe to keyword searches. I found this post because one of those keyword searches was for my name. At any given time I&#039;ve got 5-10 keyword searches that I follow. Not sure what the lesson here is, if any; but I thought I&#039;d pass the info along, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if this is helpful, but I rarely look at my stats. <a HREF="http://doc.weblogs.com/discuss/" rel="nofollow">Says here</a> my blog gets somewhere betwen 1500 and 4000 reads a day, stronger in midweek, weaker on weekends. It&#8217;s had numbers in that range since 2000. I&#8217;m told there are another 1500 who are subscribers, but &#8230; I dunno. I&#8217;m not even sure how to check.Also, I don&#8217;t subscribe to blogs in my aggregator. I subscribe to keyword searches. I found this post because one of those keyword searches was for my name. At any given time I&#8217;ve got 5-10 keyword searches that I follow. Not sure what the lesson here is, if any; but I thought I&#8217;d pass the info along, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/design-rss-and-internet-explorer/comment-page-1/#comment-4903</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2710#comment-4903</guid>
		<description>What I find strange is the flux in my RSS subscriptions - and it&#039;s interesting to hear that you experience the same thing.I had a few popular posts that were linked to and started some interesting discussions. Great. RSS subscriptions increased. Great.Over a period of a few days there were minor, yet still substantial, decreases in subscribers. Weird.I didn&#039;t post any new content, so it couldn&#039;t have been a removal based on a poor second impression. It&#039;s strange to me because, as you correctly stated, the effort to add a subscription to your RSS reader is sizeable and if you&#039;re going to exert the effort why would you then go and &quot;trim&quot; your subscription base immediately after adding the site.This explanation doesn&#039;t sit well with me either. It just doesn&#039;t make sense.Interested in your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find strange is the flux in my RSS subscriptions &#8211; and it&#8217;s interesting to hear that you experience the same thing.I had a few popular posts that were linked to and started some interesting discussions. Great. RSS subscriptions increased. Great.Over a period of a few days there were minor, yet still substantial, decreases in subscribers. Weird.I didn&#8217;t post any new content, so it couldn&#8217;t have been a removal based on a poor second impression. It&#8217;s strange to me because, as you correctly stated, the effort to add a subscription to your RSS reader is sizeable and if you&#8217;re going to exert the effort why would you then go and &#8220;trim&#8221; your subscription base immediately after adding the site.This explanation doesn&#8217;t sit well with me either. It just doesn&#8217;t make sense.Interested in your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

