<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Politics of Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/politics-of-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/politics-of-blogging/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/politics-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4896</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2712#comment-4896</guid>
		<description>Good points. Reading a few blogs for ideas and inspiration without being myself a blogger, probably gives me a slightly different view of the system. I am an user/reader.#the current way to gain visibility (personal relationships) just can&#039;t push the best ideas to the top. It&#039;s too much a social game. Politics, as you say.#the system is blog-based, not post-based. The real-world result is that a post like &quot;I went to a party yesterday&quot; from a popular blog gets a lot of counter hits (of course, who cares. I went to eat a pizza, so what?).Guy Kawasaki&#039;s blog may have received a lot of links easily but I think that&#039;s just a part of the story. It&#039;s actually a great blog.*Insights*. That&#039;s the single unique value one can extracts from a blog. Anything else is very rarely interesting.I am convinced that the system will change (post-based + reader-driven) as soon as a robust engine becomes available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. Reading a few blogs for ideas and inspiration without being myself a blogger, probably gives me a slightly different view of the system. I am an user/reader.#the current way to gain visibility (personal relationships) just can&#8217;t push the best ideas to the top. It&#8217;s too much a social game. Politics, as you say.#the system is blog-based, not post-based. The real-world result is that a post like &#8220;I went to a party yesterday&#8221; from a popular blog gets a lot of counter hits (of course, who cares. I went to eat a pizza, so what?).Guy Kawasaki&#8217;s blog may have received a lot of links easily but I think that&#8217;s just a part of the story. It&#8217;s actually a great blog.*Insights*. That&#8217;s the single unique value one can extracts from a blog. Anything else is very rarely interesting.I am convinced that the system will change (post-based + reader-driven) as soon as a robust engine becomes available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/politics-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4897</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2712#comment-4897</guid>
		<description>Thanks Om. I appreciate the link the other day and even moreso that you read my blog.Guy, I use blogger to publish, but not host, my blog, so I&#039;ve been using its comments platform.  But I didn&#039;t know you had to have a blogger account to make a comment; that&#039;s a problem.I&#039;m trying to move over to WP, but as I talked about in an earlier post today, that&#039;s not the easiest thing in the world to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Om. I appreciate the link the other day and even moreso that you read my blog.Guy, I use blogger to publish, but not host, my blog, so I&#8217;ve been using its comments platform.  But I didn&#8217;t know you had to have a blogger account to make a comment; that&#8217;s a problem.I&#8217;m trying to move over to WP, but as I talked about in an earlier post today, that&#8217;s not the easiest thing in the world to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Kawasaki</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/politics-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4898</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Kawasaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2712#comment-4898</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the defense. I didn&#039;t know I was a bad person until today. :-)By the way, why do you require creating a Blogger account to post a comment?The registration process makes you think you have to create a blog with them.Guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the defense. I didn&#8217;t know I was a bad person until today. <img src='http://www.newsome.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> By the way, why do you require creating a Blogger account to post a comment?The registration process makes you think you have to create a blog with them.Guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: om</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/politics-of-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4899</link>
		<dc:creator>om</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2712#comment-4899</guid>
		<description>good points you make - but for me, its simple - its good it gets a play. if not then, you know .... but keep up the good work. just because i don&#039;t link doesn&#039;t mean i don&#039;t read you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good points you make &#8211; but for me, its simple &#8211; its good it gets a play. if not then, you know &#8230;. but keep up the good work. just because i don&#8217;t link doesn&#8217;t mean i don&#8217;t read you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

