<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Blogosphere is Still a Growth Area</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/why-blogosphere-is-still-growth-area/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/why-blogosphere-is-still-growth-area/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/why-blogosphere-is-still-growth-area/comment-page-1/#comment-4852</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2739#comment-4852</guid>
		<description>If you mean that web pages will have syndication feeds for update alerts, and people will use stripped-down content management systems, sure, I can see that.But that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean much for &quot;blogging ...as a cultural or technological movement&quot;. I can see it being used a bait-and-switch, where &quot;blogger&quot; is used to mean &quot;unpaid pundit&quot; in one sense, for the coolness factor, and then switched to mean &quot;use of any tool or syndication feed&quot;, to pump the numbers (which happens now).From the standpoint of the idea of challenging media, there&#039;s a pretty good argument that has indeed peaked and is in decline, which is not rebutted by the fact that more people are writing diaries. There&#039;s certainly going to be some more opportunities for media slots, and even a company or two. But it&#039;s even more the domain of standard industry types, just slightly different ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you mean that web pages will have syndication feeds for update alerts, and people will use stripped-down content management systems, sure, I can see that.But that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean much for &#8220;blogging &#8230;as a cultural or technological movement&#8221;. I can see it being used a bait-and-switch, where &#8220;blogger&#8221; is used to mean &#8220;unpaid pundit&#8221; in one sense, for the coolness factor, and then switched to mean &#8220;use of any tool or syndication feed&#8221;, to pump the numbers (which happens now).From the standpoint of the idea of challenging media, there&#8217;s a pretty good argument that has indeed peaked and is in decline, which is not rebutted by the fact that more people are writing diaries. There&#8217;s certainly going to be some more opportunities for media slots, and even a company or two. But it&#8217;s even more the domain of standard industry types, just slightly different ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/why-blogosphere-is-still-growth-area/comment-page-1/#comment-4853</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2739#comment-4853</guid>
		<description>I understand that, once you factor in all the abandoned blogs, the growth rate is declining.My point is that a slowing growth rate can be explained mathmatically, is to be expected and certainly doesn&#039;t indicate that blogging is on the decline as a cultural or technological movement.I&#039;m just constantly reminded of the mid-nineties when someone would say &quot;you know Kent has a web page,&quot; like it was some exotic thing.  I get the same vibe today vis a vis blogging.If anything, I think in 10 years when someone talks about a web page, they&#039;ll be talking about what we call blogs today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that, once you factor in all the abandoned blogs, the growth rate is declining.My point is that a slowing growth rate can be explained mathmatically, is to be expected and certainly doesn&#8217;t indicate that blogging is on the decline as a cultural or technological movement.I&#8217;m just constantly reminded of the mid-nineties when someone would say &#8220;you know Kent has a web page,&#8221; like it was some exotic thing.  I get the same vibe today vis a vis blogging.If anything, I think in 10 years when someone talks about a web page, they&#8217;ll be talking about what we call blogs today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/02/why-blogosphere-is-still-growth-area/comment-page-1/#comment-4854</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2739#comment-4854</guid>
		<description>Regarding: &lt;I&gt;&quot;This is one of those questions where the goal is not to find the exact answer, because the exact answer cannot be found.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;Not at all. There&#039;s a perfectly well-defined answer. When does the number of active blogs being abandoned exceed the number of newly created blogs? (note carefully - this is a *rate*, I did not say, &quot;no new blogs will ever be created&quot;, it&#039;s the *RATE*).This actually wouldn&#039;t be a hard question to answer from a blog-tracking service. But I doubt any would be willing to answer it, since the real answer would be hype-deflating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding: <i>&#8220;This is one of those questions where the goal is not to find the exact answer, because the exact answer cannot be found.&#8221;</i>Not at all. There&#8217;s a perfectly well-defined answer. When does the number of active blogs being abandoned exceed the number of newly created blogs? (note carefully &#8211; this is a *rate*, I did not say, &#8220;no new blogs will ever be created&#8221;, it&#8217;s the *RATE*).This actually wouldn&#8217;t be a hard question to answer from a blog-tracking service. But I doubt any would be willing to answer it, since the real answer would be hype-deflating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

