<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloglogic and the Litmus Test for Link Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/bloglogic-and-litmus-test-for-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/bloglogic-and-litmus-test-for-link/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/bloglogic-and-litmus-test-for-link/comment-page-1/#comment-4811</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2768#comment-4811</guid>
		<description>There are certainly non-conversational blogs on there. PostSecrect comes to mind, but there are many others where the bloggers isn&#039;t intenting to engage the audience. Different formats. Different goals. If links and traffic are the goal of the site, engaging other bloggers and writing about content that will interest other people enough to warrant linking to are sound tactics, but quality content is the real driving force behind the traffic and links generated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are certainly non-conversational blogs on there. PostSecrect comes to mind, but there are many others where the bloggers isn&#8217;t intenting to engage the audience. Different formats. Different goals. If links and traffic are the goal of the site, engaging other bloggers and writing about content that will interest other people enough to warrant linking to are sound tactics, but quality content is the real driving force behind the traffic and links generated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/bloglogic-and-litmus-test-for-link/comment-page-1/#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2768#comment-4812</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fair point about the Amazon links.  I was thinking about traditional advertising, but should have mentioned that I have been an Amazon affiliate for years.While my Amazon revenue (without even netting out revenue from what I buy) is teens of dollars a quarter, I should have mentioned that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fair point about the Amazon links.  I was thinking about traditional advertising, but should have mentioned that I have been an Amazon affiliate for years.While my Amazon revenue (without even netting out revenue from what I buy) is teens of dollars a quarter, I should have mentioned that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TD</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/bloglogic-and-litmus-test-for-link/comment-page-1/#comment-4813</link>
		<dc:creator>TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2768#comment-4813</guid>
		<description>You wrote: &quot;as well as a lot of us who aren&#039;t trying to monetize our blog&quot;So what are the Amazon affiliate links then? Charity for somebody else&#039;s &#039;ranch&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote: &#8220;as well as a lot of us who aren&#8217;t trying to monetize our blog&#8221;So what are the Amazon affiliate links then? Charity for somebody else&#8217;s &#8216;ranch&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/bloglogic-and-litmus-test-for-link/comment-page-1/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2768#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>&quot;Conversation&quot; is an &lt;B&gt;extremely&lt;/B&gt; bad metaphor, because it invokes ideas of intimacy and equality, which do not apply here. &quot;Punditry&quot; is more accurate, as in &quot;We&#039;re all pundits&quot; (and some are widely-read, and some have essentially no audience).What you leave out in your post is the cliques, the grudges, the meanness, the bullying, etc. Sure it&#039;s like big family dinner - if your family is &lt;EM&gt;The Sopranos&lt;/EM&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Conversation&#8221; is an <b>extremely</b> bad metaphor, because it invokes ideas of intimacy and equality, which do not apply here. &#8220;Punditry&#8221; is more accurate, as in &#8220;We&#8217;re all pundits&#8221; (and some are widely-read, and some have essentially no audience).What you leave out in your post is the cliques, the grudges, the meanness, the bullying, etc. Sure it&#8217;s like big family dinner &#8211; if your family is <em>The Sopranos</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

