<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CyberSalon: It&#8217;s Not the Writing that Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/cybersalon-its-not-writing-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/cybersalon-its-not-writing-that/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/cybersalon-its-not-writing-that/comment-page-1/#comment-4725</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2844#comment-4725</guid>
		<description>I think eventually the middlemen will be filters and search engines.In the meantime, there will still be traditional media gatekeepers, but the gate will shift from paper to online.For example, I am not one of those who believe that blogs will ever  replace traditional sources for typical news.  I don&#039;t want to get my straight news from a blog.  I still read the Houston Chronicle, but I do it online.There will always be a place for an old-media equivalent for straight news.But those old media equivalents will be competing with a ton of other sources, some of them local, for the  extended news (op-ed, culture, tech, music, etc.) eyeballs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think eventually the middlemen will be filters and search engines.In the meantime, there will still be traditional media gatekeepers, but the gate will shift from paper to online.For example, I am not one of those who believe that blogs will ever  replace traditional sources for typical news.  I don&#8217;t want to get my straight news from a blog.  I still read the Houston Chronicle, but I do it online.There will always be a place for an old-media equivalent for straight news.But those old media equivalents will be competing with a ton of other sources, some of them local, for the  extended news (op-ed, culture, tech, music, etc.) eyeballs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/cybersalon-its-not-writing-that/comment-page-1/#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2844#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>And now there will be ... drumroll ... new gatekeepers.That is, I think this sentence is not quite right:&lt;EM&gt;&quot;It&#039;s about the loss of control of the distribution of the writing&quot;&lt;/EM&gt;I believe it would be better as &quot;It&#039;s about the *shifts* *in* *control* of the distribution of the writing&quot;But this part is very wrong: &quot;There is a lessening of the need for a middleman to direct content to us&quot;There&#039;s the same need, and still middlemen - how could it be otherwise, with so many pieces of writing competing for a finite attention pool?But *who* will be the those middlemen - that&#039;s what these discussions are always circling around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now there will be &#8230; drumroll &#8230; new gatekeepers.That is, I think this sentence is not quite right:<em>&#8220;It&#8217;s about the loss of control of the distribution of the writing&#8221;</em>I believe it would be better as &#8220;It&#8217;s about the *shifts* *in* *control* of the distribution of the writing&#8221;But this part is very wrong: &#8220;There is a lessening of the need for a middleman to direct content to us&#8221;There&#8217;s the same need, and still middlemen &#8211; how could it be otherwise, with so many pieces of writing competing for a finite attention pool?But *who* will be the those middlemen &#8211; that&#8217;s what these discussions are always circling around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/cybersalon-its-not-writing-that/comment-page-1/#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2844#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>Exactly.  Just like the record labels used to be the gatekeepers between musicians and listeners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.  Just like the record labels used to be the gatekeepers between musicians and listeners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/03/cybersalon-its-not-writing-that/comment-page-1/#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2844#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>Hmm ... &lt;EM&gt;&quot;It&#039;s the control over the distribution of the writing.&quot;&lt;/EM&gt;One might say ... in a word ... gatekeeping!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8230; <em>&#8220;It&#8217;s the control over the distribution of the writing.&#8221;</em>One might say &#8230; in a word &#8230; gatekeeping!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

