<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anti Microsoft Eat Google Rule?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/anti-microsoft-eat-google-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/anti-microsoft-eat-google-rule/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kalbzayn</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/anti-microsoft-eat-google-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-4652</link>
		<dc:creator>kalbzayn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 02:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2905#comment-4652</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the real beef the Windows comes magically installed on everybody&#039;s computer.  And with it IE magically appears.  And then if IE defaults to Microsoft search....isn&#039;t that the real problem Google has?  If computers came installed with both IE and Firefox I think they would lose the argument, but the Microsoft lock in seems like it could still be a serious complaint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the real beef the Windows comes magically installed on everybody&#8217;s computer.  And with it IE magically appears.  And then if IE defaults to Microsoft search&#8230;.isn&#8217;t that the real problem Google has?  If computers came installed with both IE and Firefox I think they would lose the argument, but the Microsoft lock in seems like it could still be a serious complaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

