<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogs Without Links Are Not Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/blogs-without-links-are-not-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/blogs-without-links-are-not-blogs/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/blogs-without-links-are-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4643</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2910#comment-4643</guid>
		<description>I think the Who said it best:&quot;Meet the new boss/Same as the old boss.&quot;The revolution will be assimilated, and the new guard starts behaving like the old guard. Couldn&#039;t you see this coming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Who said it best:&#8221;Meet the new boss/Same as the old boss.&#8221;The revolution will be assimilated, and the new guard starts behaving like the old guard. Couldn&#8217;t you see this coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kalbzayn</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/blogs-without-links-are-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4644</link>
		<dc:creator>kalbzayn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2910#comment-4644</guid>
		<description>My favorite part about Seth&#039;s post about how strong bloggers don&#039;t link is that he not only links, but then pastes an entire article written by someone else.What does that mean that we can assume about Seth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite part about Seth&#8217;s post about how strong bloggers don&#8217;t link is that he not only links, but then pastes an entire article written by someone else.What does that mean that we can assume about Seth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mojotek</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/blogs-without-links-are-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4645</link>
		<dc:creator>Mojotek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2910#comment-4645</guid>
		<description>Wow, I had no idea this was becoming an issue with the self-proclaimed &quot;A-List&quot; bloggers.  I wonder how that will play out in the long run if they actually sort to this type of buffoonary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I had no idea this was becoming an issue with the self-proclaimed &#8220;A-List&#8221; bloggers.  I wonder how that will play out in the long run if they actually sort to this type of buffoonary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/blogs-without-links-are-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2910#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>Heck, Kent, don&#039;t let Big Bloviating Egos like that determine whether you&#039;re going to blog or not--because then you&#039;re letting them determine just what &quot;blogging&quot; is, and it becomes a self-determining prophecy...a blogging net filled with lonely islands populated by BBEs.And I still wonder just how these folks think people find *them*?  By just randomly typing things into their address bars?  What they&#039;re implying is that it&#039;s okay for others to link to *them*, but They Are Above It All.Piffle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, Kent, don&#8217;t let Big Bloviating Egos like that determine whether you&#8217;re going to blog or not&#8211;because then you&#8217;re letting them determine just what &#8220;blogging&#8221; is, and it becomes a self-determining prophecy&#8230;a blogging net filled with lonely islands populated by BBEs.And I still wonder just how these folks think people find *them*?  By just randomly typing things into their address bars?  What they&#8217;re implying is that it&#8217;s okay for others to link to *them*, but They Are Above It All.Piffle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/blogs-without-links-are-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4647</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2910#comment-4647</guid>
		<description>Totally right, Kent. If a blog without comments isn&#039;t really a blog (as I&#039;ve argued) then a  blog without links is even less of a blog. As your other commenter implies, doing this reflects the same sort of arrogant attitude that many people get from mainstream media -- the &quot;I know everything there is to know about this&quot; attitude. Except print media have an excuse -- they can&#039;t link. Bloggers have no excuse but their own vanity or laziness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally right, Kent. If a blog without comments isn&#8217;t really a blog (as I&#8217;ve argued) then a  blog without links is even less of a blog. As your other commenter implies, doing this reflects the same sort of arrogant attitude that many people get from mainstream media &#8212; the &#8220;I know everything there is to know about this&#8221; attitude. Except print media have an excuse &#8212; they can&#8217;t link. Bloggers have no excuse but their own vanity or laziness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardQuerin</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/05/blogs-without-links-are-not-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-4648</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardQuerin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2910#comment-4648</guid>
		<description>Hi Kent,Blogs without links are... magazine articles. I think that some of these guys are hoping that the environment around blogging coalesces into another version of the print industry. Wannabe magazine columnists I guess. Aren&#039;t they missing the point/power of linking entirely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kent,Blogs without links are&#8230; magazine articles. I think that some of these guys are hoping that the environment around blogging coalesces into another version of the print industry. Wannabe magazine columnists I guess. Aren&#8217;t they missing the point/power of linking entirely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

