<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Swift Way to Blog Stardom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/06/swift-way-to-blog-stardom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/06/swift-way-to-blog-stardom/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wolff</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/06/swift-way-to-blog-stardom/comment-page-1/#comment-4603</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 02:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2951#comment-4603</guid>
		<description>There are many recipes, and new ones written and tested daily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many recipes, and new ones written and tested daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/06/swift-way-to-blog-stardom/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2951#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>Simple: When no patterns or structure can be drawn. That&#039;s clearly not the case. It&#039;s very silly, verging on misleading evangelism, if the argument is that if there is more than one and only one recipe, no conclusions can be drawn, it&#039;s all a mismash, nothing can be said.The idea is not that all followers of a recipe WILL succeed - that clearly can&#039;t be true, by numbers. Rather, that success often can be traced to certain recipes (not the same thing - if you want to be elected President of the US, you MUST raise a huge amount of money. If you raise a huge amount of money, it doesn&#039;t follow that you WILL be elected President of the US).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple: When no patterns or structure can be drawn. That&#8217;s clearly not the case. It&#8217;s very silly, verging on misleading evangelism, if the argument is that if there is more than one and only one recipe, no conclusions can be drawn, it&#8217;s all a mismash, nothing can be said.The idea is not that all followers of a recipe WILL succeed &#8211; that clearly can&#8217;t be true, by numbers. Rather, that success often can be traced to certain recipes (not the same thing &#8211; if you want to be elected President of the US, you MUST raise a huge amount of money. If you raise a huge amount of money, it doesn&#8217;t follow that you WILL be elected President of the US).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/06/swift-way-to-blog-stardom/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2951#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>At what point does a bunch of recipes for a popular blog equate to no recipe (singular) for a popular blog?Being a A-Lister&#039;s pet isn&#039;t a cake you can bake- it&#039;s a cake that someone else bakes for you.Being an A-Lister&#039;s critic is a writing style, not a recipe.  I know a lot of blogs that do the critic thing without getting a lot of traffic.Steve Gillmor has a recipe for being arrogant and using needlessly long words, but I don&#039;t even consider his writing, the way he wants to develop it, to be a blog.I just don&#039;t think you can add a bunch of ingredients/approaches to your blog, mix it up and, presto, get a ton of constant traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At what point does a bunch of recipes for a popular blog equate to no recipe (singular) for a popular blog?Being a A-Lister&#8217;s pet isn&#8217;t a cake you can bake- it&#8217;s a cake that someone else bakes for you.Being an A-Lister&#8217;s critic is a writing style, not a recipe.  I know a lot of blogs that do the critic thing without getting a lot of traffic.Steve Gillmor has a recipe for being arrogant and using needlessly long words, but I don&#8217;t even consider his writing, the way he wants to develop it, to be a blog.I just don&#8217;t think you can add a bunch of ingredients/approaches to your blog, mix it up and, presto, get a ton of constant traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/06/swift-way-to-blog-stardom/comment-page-1/#comment-4606</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=2951#comment-4606</guid>
		<description>&quot;The point is that there is no recipe you can follow to ensure a popular blog. All you can do is write hard, try to write well, join in the conversations and wait.&quot;Nonsense. His post is making humor out of juxtaposing fragments, which is funny, but hardly means there are no recipes. There are *several* recipes - you can be an A-lister&#039;s pet, you can be an A-lister&#039;s critic, you can be a *professional* pundit and ignore the lower-level linking games, etc.All that means is that there&#039;s (a few?) different recipes - not NO recipes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The point is that there is no recipe you can follow to ensure a popular blog. All you can do is write hard, try to write well, join in the conversations and wait.&#8221;Nonsense. His post is making humor out of juxtaposing fragments, which is funny, but hardly means there are no recipes. There are *several* recipes &#8211; you can be an A-lister&#8217;s pet, you can be an A-lister&#8217;s critic, you can be a *professional* pundit and ignore the lower-level linking games, etc.All that means is that there&#8217;s (a few?) different recipes &#8211; not NO recipes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

