<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If I Can&#8217;t Have a Revenue Model, Then Neither Can You!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/07/if-i-cant-have-revenue-model-then/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/07/if-i-cant-have-revenue-model-then/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/07/if-i-cant-have-revenue-model-then/comment-page-1/#comment-4548</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3003#comment-4548</guid>
		<description>This Web 2.0 Groupthink perception problem is encouraged by the &quot;virtual&quot; environment and has been an issue far longer then Web 2.0. The .com group was in some part guilty of the same type of thinking. I agree with Randy that part of the problem is that the majority of the Web 2.0 Group are not businessmen. I also belive that contributing to this attitude is the fact that there are investors who will put up substantial funds without requiring   a substainable revenue stream plan  based upon something other then just ad revenue. As far as EBay&#039;s move to prevent Google&#039;s Checkout Service, they have every right to run their business the way they want to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Web 2.0 Groupthink perception problem is encouraged by the &#8220;virtual&#8221; environment and has been an issue far longer then Web 2.0. The .com group was in some part guilty of the same type of thinking. I agree with Randy that part of the problem is that the majority of the Web 2.0 Group are not businessmen. I also belive that contributing to this attitude is the fact that there are investors who will put up substantial funds without requiring   a substainable revenue stream plan  based upon something other then just ad revenue. As far as EBay&#8217;s move to prevent Google&#8217;s Checkout Service, they have every right to run their business the way they want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Charles Morin</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/07/if-i-cant-have-revenue-model-then/comment-page-1/#comment-4549</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3003#comment-4549</guid>
		<description>Excellent post. Of course, most of the Web 2.0 group think are engineers, not  businessmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post. Of course, most of the Web 2.0 group think are engineers, not  businessmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

