Email- as Quaint as Those Old Letters?

One of the neat by-products of the migration of our culture online was the return of the written word- via the emergence of email as a primary mode of communication.  The telephone largely replaced letter writing, but email allowed the written word to muscle its way back into our everyday lives.

For a while.

Now Fred Wilson (who I continue to read, enjoy and link to, even though he is not a particularly conversational blogger) says that spam, with a little help from AOL, is killing email. There’s no doubt that spam is a major pain in the ass for emailers (and fax machine owners) everywhere.  I have found, however, that the newer versions of Outlook do a pretty good job of weeding out spam- as long as you regularly update your junk email filters.  But something else is taking a toll on email- at least personal email.

It’s text messaging via handhelds and IM via computers.

Email will always rule over the business arena, because of the archival and attachment advantages, but as far as personal communications goes, the migration has started to move to text messaging and IM, at the hands of young people.

As Stephen Baker points out, young people are far more likely to use text messaging or IM to communicate with their friends than email.

Even the young adults I know seem to greatly prefer text messaging to emails.  It’s quicker, they say.  And as Stephen points out, there’s less thought required.  In other words, it’s a few steps away from a letter and closer to verbal communication.

For those of us who don’t use text messaging or IM very much, it seems foreign to rely on them for your primary connection to others, in lieu of a phone call or an email.

But to our kids, an email seems sort of quaint.  Like those letters in that shoebox they found in the attic.

Tags: , ,

  • Share/Bookmark
  • I'm not a big fan of text messaging. I don't know why. And as a 33-year-old writer/photographer, I don't really consider myself part of the "younger" generation anymore. But I have to admit that email/instant messaging is my preferred method of communicaiton as well.

    I actually met my best friend through my website two years ago, and have been privileged to spend time with him and his family several times, even though we live almost a thousand miles apart.

    As freelancers, we both have missed having co-workers during the day. Now, through IM, we effectively have those moments in the day of popping a head over a virtual cubicle to say, "Man, this project SUCKS," or "God, I'm so hungry. What are you having for lunch?" or "You know, work is so slow right now. I don't know what I'm going to do if I don't pick up a few more clients this week."

    And while we do occasionally talk by phone, I've found that IM offers a more open, honest form of communication in real-time. I've shared secrets I'd never admit to in person, and been able to resolve conflicts and hurt feelings far more quickly through the benefit of having to think a moment and being able to retract hastily typed, angry words.

    Rather than detracting from my real life friendships, my online friendships seem to enhance them and illustrate more clearly the individual things I share with each person.

    Text messaging though.... I just don't get it. I'm not sure why. It's a logical leap from IM, but feels different somehow. Even though I have a BlackBerry, I still IM from it instead of text. Most of my friends don't carry their phones all the time, so texting would be pointless with them. Again, maybe a generational thing.









  • In the same way that internet capability marks a generational divide, the ability to (rapidly) text on a mobile phone marks another (in my opinion). I watch in awe the thumb prowess of the young texters, but I do wonder if it's all that healthy in the long run on the thumbs involved.
blog comments powered by Disqus