<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ROI of Conversational Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2006/10/roi-of-conversational-blogging_03/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/10/roi-of-conversational-blogging_03/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/10/roi-of-conversational-blogging_03/comment-page-1/#comment-4243</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3242#comment-4243</guid>
		<description>Some people, are, in fact, in it for the money. Or at least want to have some idea of whether there&#039;s enough money to justify it even if there are other motives. So there needs to be some way to objectively determine if the activity is worthwhile.Part of this confusion is the deliberate, willful, corruption of the word &quot;conversation&quot; to *mean* &quot;marketing&quot; (as in the infamous &quot;markets are conversations&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people, are, in fact, in it for the money. Or at least want to have some idea of whether there&#8217;s enough money to justify it even if there are other motives. So there needs to be some way to objectively determine if the activity is worthwhile.Part of this confusion is the deliberate, willful, corruption of the word &#8220;conversation&#8221; to *mean* &#8220;marketing&#8221; (as in the infamous &#8220;markets are conversations&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob@blogoftheday.org</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/10/roi-of-conversational-blogging_03/comment-page-1/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>rob@blogoftheday.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3242#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>Great blog!  I&#039;ve added a link to your blog on Blog of the Day under the category of Business.  To view the feature of your blog, please visit &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://blogoftheday.org/page/112541&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogoftheday.org/page/112541&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog!  I&#8217;ve added a link to your blog on Blog of the Day under the category of Business.  To view the feature of your blog, please visit <a HREF="http://blogoftheday.org/page/112541" rel="nofollow">http://blogoftheday.org/page/112541</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2006/10/roi-of-conversational-blogging_03/comment-page-1/#comment-4245</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3242#comment-4245</guid>
		<description>Excellant post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellant post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

