| Kent Newsome on technology, music and life | |||||
![]() HereElsewhereSubscribeVia RSSVia Phone or PDA
News River View
Via EmailListenShop(@ Amazon.Com)OthersArchivesSearchDISCLOSURE:
|
![]() |
11/13/2006Web 3.0: Just Say No(thing)Memo to Stowe and Scott (and many others, and I guess me now): by writing about this Web 3.0 business, you are propagating the needless jargon you want to bury. Media and marketing are always looking for the next slogan, the next hook, the next big thing. If one doesn't come along fast enough, they'll try to invent one. Wikipedia summarizes this age old marketing concept:
If you can get associated with the big thing of the moment, there's authority to be had and money to be made. That's part of why a bunch of people get their noses out of joint when they aren't invited to pay thousands of dollars to attend an O'Reilly Web 2.0 conference. That's all there is to John Markoff's Web 3.0 article. An attempt to get a little traction, and maybe create a religion in the process. A little L. Ron kitchen work, web style. Nick Carr hopes Web 3.0 will be better. If not, someone can toss Web 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 against the wall until one of them sticks. Nick quotes Markoff quoting some cat who's a promoter (that's a funny word in this context) of artificial intelligence. He thinks Web 3.0 is spooky. I think what's even more spooky is when people create needless jargon and we all jump in line to help publicize it. I also think more than a little of the intelligence that led to the premature buzz (such as it is) about Web 3.0 is, well, artificial. Like the plastic apple in a bowl, it looks tasty pretty from afar. But one bite tells you there's nothing to it but artifice and air. On the other hand, how silly is it of me to write a post suggesting that we not talk about Web 3.0? I tried, and failed, not to write this post. I am doing the very thing I think we shouldn't do- take the bait and run with it. Does the fact that I know it make it any less culpable? I don't know. Hopefully I can resist writing another post about Web 3.0 for a long time. Maybe forever. Allison Krauss was right- sometimes we say it best when we say nothing at all. Submit to: Digg | Netscape | Reddit | Tailrank Bookmark on: Del.icio.us | Furl | Ma.gnolia Reactions: 2 Comments | Post a Comment | Inbound Links 2 Comment(s):
Well, I can hardly resist writing this comment, so i'll leave it here as a Newsome.org exclusive.
By Ethan, at
11/13/2006 4:16 PM
I couldn't agree with you more. Why can't we just let the web be the web. It's going to change and it's going to evolve. We don't need to be labeling it. If we did, we'd have to have Web 2.1, and then 2.1.0.1 (security fixes), Web 2.6.17, etc. Let's just let it be.
By Hogg, at
11/13/2006 9:52 PM
Links to this post: |
![]() |
ListenRead |
|
DISCLAIMER
Newsome.Org, Kent's blog and the related pages and content are solely the thoughts and opinions of Kent Newsome in his personal capacity and are not associated with any other person or entity, including, without limitation, any partnership or other business entity Kent may now or hereafter be associated with. |
|||||






