<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Gets Clear Access to the Airwaves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2007/04/google-gets-clear-access-to-airwaves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2007/04/google-gets-clear-access-to-airwaves/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Charles Morin</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2007/04/google-gets-clear-access-to-airwaves/comment-page-1/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3313#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>Chiphttp://twitter.com/SterlingCamden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chiphttp://twitter.com/SterlingCamden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2007/04/google-gets-clear-access-to-airwaves/comment-page-1/#comment-4058</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3313#comment-4058</guid>
		<description>Google is entering some very conflict of interesting areas it seems to me.  I was just reading about Matt Cutt saying that they are trying to figure out how to track down all of the sites selling text link ads for page rank purposes.  Funny that the king of all web advertising companies would care about this.  It also seems funny to think of the conflict between providing &quot;pure, best interest for the searches&quot; search results and then allowing paid ads to be mixed into it in any way.Now they head out into other areas.  I would probably feel more comfortable if they separated their search and ad companies into different companies.When are baby is born in October, I&#039;m thinking of naming him/her Google or GBaby or something that Google might want to buy the rights to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is entering some very conflict of interesting areas it seems to me.  I was just reading about Matt Cutt saying that they are trying to figure out how to track down all of the sites selling text link ads for page rank purposes.  Funny that the king of all web advertising companies would care about this.  It also seems funny to think of the conflict between providing &#8220;pure, best interest for the searches&#8221; search results and then allowing paid ads to be mixed into it in any way.Now they head out into other areas.  I would probably feel more comfortable if they separated their search and ad companies into different companies.When are baby is born in October, I&#8217;m thinking of naming him/her Google or GBaby or something that Google might want to buy the rights to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

