<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is New School a Synonym for Blogomercial?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newsome.org/2007/06/is-new-school-synonym-for-blogomercial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newsome.org/2007/06/is-new-school-synonym-for-blogomercial/</link>
	<description>Kent Newsome on technology, music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TD</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2007/06/is-new-school-synonym-for-blogomercial/comment-page-1/#comment-3666</link>
		<dc:creator>TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3428#comment-3666</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why they could have opted out of the sponsored page and only run the ads? I don&#039;t have a problem with the ads, but the sponsored pages with quotes sure looks a lot like endorsements.If the quasi-endorsement page was a required part of the deal then they should have all been smart enough to see this coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why they could have opted out of the sponsored page and only run the ads? I don&#8217;t have a problem with the ads, but the sponsored pages with quotes sure looks a lot like endorsements.If the quasi-endorsement page was a required part of the deal then they should have all been smart enough to see this coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TD</title>
		<link>http://www.newsome.org/2007/06/is-new-school-synonym-for-blogomercial/comment-page-1/#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/newsome/?p=3428#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why they could have opted out of the sponsored page and only run the ads? I don&#039;t have a problem with the ads, but the sponsored pages with quotes sure looks a lot like endorsements.If the quasi-endorsement page was a required part of the deal then they should have all been smart enough to see this coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why they could have opted out of the sponsored page and only run the ads? I don&#8217;t have a problem with the ads, but the sponsored pages with quotes sure looks a lot like endorsements.If the quasi-endorsement page was a required part of the deal then they should have all been smart enough to see this coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

