| Kent Newsome on technology, music and life | |||||
![]() HereElsewhereSubscribeVia RSSVia Phone or PDA
News River View
Via EmailListenShop(@ Amazon.Com)OthersArchivesSearchDISCLOSURE:
|
![]() |
1/22/2008Evening Extra: High Definition DVD EditionIf you've been waiting for the fat lady to sing with respect to the high definition DVD format war, it looks like she's warming up. Engadget reports that with the Warner defection, Blu-ray players have 93% of the HD market. Meanwhile, Universal continues to carry the HD DVD banner, Toshiba slashes the price of its HD DVD players, and thousands of people have signed a petition to "save HD DVD." A petition (and some nuts- both kinds) worked, at least temporarily, for Jericho. I'm not so sure it will be as successful for a DVD format. Can you say Betamax? And in the other corner, it seems 6,000 people have signed a petition to let HD DVD die. James Berardinelli, my all-time favorite movie critic, posted his thoughts a couple of weeks ago:
MG Siegler notes that "the early 2008 sales numbers are looking very bad for HD-DVD. The format apparently only accounted for only 15% of high-definition disc sales in early January and failed to land a single title on the best-sellers list - all were Blu-ray discs." I don't own any high definition DVD players, having decided to wait for this battle to play out. I'm not ready to buy one yet, particularly given the Profile 2.0 fiasco, but if this trend continues, it won't be long. Those of you unfamiliar with the differences in the formats and the players can get a quick primer via Paul Stamatiou. For those wanting to write a thesis on the topic, there's the Wikipedia entry. Submit to: Digg | Netscape | Reddit | Tailrank Bookmark on: Del.icio.us | Furl | Ma.gnolia Reactions: 0 Comments | Post a Comment | Inbound Links 0 Comment(s):Links to this post: |
![]() |
ListenRead |
|
DISCLAIMER
Newsome.Org, Kent's blog and the related pages and content are solely the thoughts and opinions of Kent Newsome in his personal capacity and are not associated with any other person or entity, including, without limitation, any partnership or other business entity Kent may now or hereafter be associated with. |
|||||




