There’s a Thousand in Every Crowd

Despite the fact that it often feels like a mashup of Deepak Chopra and P.T. Barnum, I continue to enjoy Twitter.

But Twitter has a growing content problem, that if not checked will ultimately reduce Twitter to an online version of your email junk mail folder.

For starters, the volume of MLM, get rich quick and grow your follower count posts (3 versions of the same thing) is light years beyond absurd.  Add to that an endless supply of self-help posts, many of which are either nonsensical to the point of self-parody or disguised spam.  And then there’s this one dude who obsessively posts the same links day after day, which doesn’t particularly annoy me except that I can’t figure out why he does it.  If he doesn’t have an angle, he’s the most dedicated linker in the history of html.

One conclusion I have reached after spending a good amount of time on Twitter is that there are thousands of people trying to sell the same thing to each other.  MLM opportunities, get rich quick schemes, self-confidence, karma, etc.  There are vendors everywhere and, as far as I can tell, not a customer in sight.

 

I also wonder how potential Twitter advertisers feel about this demographic.  If everyone is selling, who is left to buy?

But among all the noise, there are many benefits.  I have seen links to interesting articles, beautiful photographs and great songs.  Most by people who, if you can believe it, aren’t trying to make money off of me or sell me some get (them) rich quick scheme.  I have also made contact with developers who have answered questions and provided assistance with respect to their applications.  In return, I try to add value and fun by posting links to interesting articles, and by posting music.  I have been doing an alphabetical survey of new wave music, via the Blip.fm/Twitter integration.  It takes time to find the music, and to add short commentary to each.  But it’s fun and I’m building a good playlist over at Blip.fm.

But maybe I am misusing Twitter by doing all that.  Maybe I should forget about content and focus on MLM and how to increase my follower count and whatnot.  Because in the midst of all of the Twitter chaos, it seems that posting music makes me a spammer.

I’ve received many positive responses to my music posts, and a grand total of two complaints.  This dude and another guy from Houston, thereby proving what I already sort of knew- that I live in a town of music haters.  Not really, but it’s interesting that anyone who has spent 5 minutes in the great Twitter flea market can get all pissy over a series of song posts, manually done, with commentary (to be fair, he later said that maybe spam wasn’t the best word to use).  He un-followed me, which is exactly what he should have done if he didn’t want to see my music posts, and this little issue was resolved.  But I think this exchange is indicative of the bigger content problem Twitter is facing.

In sum, there is a huge spam problem on Twitter, but in the words of Lynyrd Skynyrd (another annoying music reference), I ain’t the one.  Yet it seems I’m not the only one being labeled as a spammer, just because I’m not trying to game Twitter or sell people a bill of goods.

Another tech blogger who isn’t trying to make money on Twitter is Louis Gray.  It seems that the Twanalyst application, one of the many barnacles that cling to Twitter’s traffic-rich API, believes that Louis is spamming Twitter, in part because he doesn’t retweet (e.g., repost) a bunch of other people’s posts.  That is even more absurd that these muddy sticks squawking about my music.

Louis presents a logical and iron-clad defense of his Twitter philosophy:

In my opinion, begging for retweets, and retweeting is simply lazy, just like live tweeting a conference panel is lazy blogging. It’s the equivalent of forwarding e-mail, or copying and pasting someone else’s blog post to your site and adding a short link. If Twitter is truly conversational, as many argue, then repeating what someone else has said doesn’t do much to add to the conversation.

Amen, brother, although I don’t think Twitter is as conversational as we would like, or as many would have us believe.

Interestingly, Twanalyst doesn’t think I’m a spammer.  It says I am a “renowned obsessive cautious” personality with a “chatty academic” style, whatever that means.

 

All of this nonsense demonstrates that the rules and expectations on and about Twitter have been turned upside down.  If you blast links and mindlessly retweet posts by others, you’re viewed as adding value.  If you obsessively post about MLM, getting more followers and making money, no problem.  But if you post actual content or- God forbid- music, you are a spammer.  Or at least an annoyance.

At the beginning and end of the day, I don’t care if someone thinks I am spamming- just stop following me.  And I’m not going to unsubscribe from Louis’s blog because some application thinks he needs to change his Twitter approach.  But I think Twitter needs to develop a plan for encouraging good content.  So far it looks, at least from the outside, like Twitter is solely interested in traffic, at the expense of just about everything else.

At some point the coolness factor will fade, and Twitter will have to rely on good content.

Like music.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags:

  • I recognised the problem caused by the sheer number of music tweets I generate some time ago - they would totally swamp my other tweets on most days when I'm at home (@clocsen).

    My solution is to have a separate twitter account which streams my music listening for anyone who cares to watch (@clocsen_fm). It does get some subscribers, but I don't analyse them so can't say whether they're would-be spammers or so.

    Having said that, I'm not totally sure what benefit it gives anyone by doing this in twitter. On balance, I would prefer people who are interested to follow my listening habits on my chosen music service last.fm (http://www.last.fm/user/clocsen) or its rss feed. We can also become friends there.

    I still tweet commentary on particular music items in my main account.
  • I agree that Blip.fm tweets, if overused, can feel like spam. I wrote an article about it a while back, and stopped doing it myself because I didn't like it from others. It's at its worse on a Friday or Saturday night, when three-sheets-under-the-wind folks often do nothing but tweet song-after-song-after-song. Although it takes two seconds to filter out these tweets in TweetDeck, it’s still pretty irritating.

    As for the spammers/marketers/self-promoters, I agree to a point, although virtually everybody on Twitter is promoting something. I share an enormous amount of great content but also link to my own new pieces once a day, too. That's pretty common for every blogger on the network. Everybody has something to sell on the internet, even if it’s only themselves. As long as that’s not all you do (as per your guy above), then it’s fine.

    Two other kinds of folk on Twitter who seem to get an enormous amount of followers are those who tweet nothing but 'motivational' quotes, and those who tweet nothing but stuff like 'Today is the greatest day of your life! Seize the opportunity!' and that kind of meaningless crap. But as said thousands seem to love this stuff. It defies logic. I guess the only explanation is as Twitter matures and grows it will increasingly reflect ‘real world’ society, much like the internet itself, and therefore be as chock-full of the mentals and delusional as anywhere else.

    Incidentally, according to Twanalyst I’m a spammer AND a celebrity.

    http://twanalyst.com/status.php?search=Sheamus

    Which probably says all you need to know about the accuracy of their algorithm.
  • Unfortunately, the "don't read" argument doesn't work. How do you know which tweets to not read, without reading them? In a medium like Twitter, the title is the content, skimming is reading.

    When I skim through five tweets in a row, each one starting with song name, ending with note symbol and blip.fm link, I process it as machine generated spam. Blame it on years of doing e-mail in the pre-gmail days :-)

    If I actually took the time to read these tweets, they're all personalized commentary, they're ham not spam. It's just that skimming through them triggers my spam reflex.

    I follow other people who tweet about music/bands/shows, that I don't care for, but don't have a problem skimming past. So I think it's the format, not the interest.
  • Yes, I stay on my home page. My policy generally is to follow anyone who isn't an obvious spammer who follows me, and then weed out from there. So my feed is probably not as clean as yours.

    About the music. You know I respect your opinion, so I'll think about it.

    Here's my question, though. If you enjoy a lot of different stuff (let's say for an easy example, 70% techy stuff and 30% music), there's no current way to avoid sharing the 30% with those who are only interested in the 70% and vice versa.

    There are a lot of things in my feed- even from my friends- that don't really interest me. I just ignore that stuff, and it rolls off the page pretty quickly.

    It seems impossible to find a group of people who closely mirror all of your interests, so it seems that some amount of static is unavoidable.

    Do you see it differently?
  • If you enable auto login, then every time you visit twitter.com, it will redirect you to http://twitter.com/home. Home is what you make of it. Mine is full of friends, fellow geeks, interesting people and a couple news sources.

    Twitter is not TV, you're not forced to a few channels. It's not school, you get to choose who you hang out with. It's not LinkedIn, you don't have to follow your coworkers. It's exactly what you decide you want to read. The only people in your timeline are the ones you invited into your timeline.

    And yes, blip.fm tweets feel like spam. One person's spam is another person's ham, I'm not surprised other people like it, I'm just not that into discovering new music. Comparing them to MLM is strawman, and I'm quite surprised you went there.

    There is zero MLM in my timeline. There are no get rick quick or persistent linkers or content-free posters for that matter (though, a few of these follow me). So in my timeline, these blip.fm tweets stand out.

    For now, they're balanced by the quality links that I do enjoy reading.
blog comments powered by Disqus