Seesmic is Dead, Long Live Seesmic

So Twitter buys Tweetie, and some say this is another Apple-like maneuver designed to smack down third party developers and control the whole show.

Who knows what Twitter’s objective is.  I’m not entirely sure Twitter knows.  But I certainly don’t see this as the death knell of third party Twitter apps.

For one, choice is good.  For everyone.  Unless Twitter locks out third party developers, which simply will not happen, just because Twitter owns a desktop and/or mobile app doesn’t mean third party apps can’t thrive.  Hell, Twitter owns Twitter already, and the whole reason we need third party apps is because the native Twitter platform- and the unenhanced experience- is so lacking.

In other words, there are enough holes in the Twitter experience to keep third party pluggers busy for a long time.

Creating

I have Tweetie on my iPhone.  I used to use it, and thought it was a well made app.  But lately I create most of my Twitter content in third party apps (WordPress, Live Writer, Posterous, Foursquare, etc.) and push content from there to Twitter.  I can’t imagine that I’ll ever go back to creating whatever content I publish to Twitter on a dedicated Twitter web page or app.

Not to mention the very relevant fact that the Tweetie desktop app is Mac only.

Consuming

As far as reading Twitter goes, well where to start?  First of all, I don’t think there are that many people who do it.  What I mean by that is that tons of people cast their content onto Twitter, but other than hardcore geeks and people with skin in the game I don’t think anybody really consumes their online content at Twitter (not in the least because most information tossed into Twitter is in the form of links to content elsewhere).  I think Twitter is one giant California with millions of prospectors setting up camp there in hopes of finding gold.  If there is no gold, or when the gold is all taken, most of the herd will move on to the next land rush.

I’d really like to know the percentage of people who regularly read Twitter who do not regularly post to Twitter.  I bet it’s a relatively small number.

To the extent that people do read Twitter, a third party app is a necessity.  Multiple columns, better list handling, the list goes on and on.  Again, choice is good for everyone.  If Twitter is the big honking deal the Twitterati  is trying to convince us it is, how in the world can you say there isn’t room for a multitude of apps and options?

Do we all drive Fords?

image 
Seesmic Web is infinitely better than the native Twitter web site

Furthermore, many people- myself very much included- prefer web based apps.  If this is the year of the cloud, why would I download a desktop app to read Twitter?  This is the main reason why I prefer Seesmic.  The other being an elegant, but not overdone, feature set.  Very Apple like, in a good, non-evil, way.

So I’m not ready to morn Seesmic or any Twitter-dependant app.  I think they’ll do fine.

At least until the gold runs out.

8 thoughts on “Seesmic is Dead, Long Live Seesmic

  1. I think the sole reason Twitter bought Tweetie is so they have their own mobile app solution they can control. At the moment all they have s a web site. (And to a lesser extent Tweetie offers a desktop app, but as Tweetie is mac only I doubt that's a factor, though it will be interesting to see if they move into a windows desktop space).One thing that does bug me is the reliance on Air that so many Twitter desktop apps rely on.

  2. I have zero experience with AIR beyond the fact that Pandora uses it, but there do seem to be a lot of Twitter apps wrapped in it. Maybe it makes it easier to deploy Flash and script to different desktops. I don't get the advantage to having data local, but there must be a perceived benefit…I think this was probably a very good buy for Twitter, but I don't see it as a radical change to the Twitter app development landscape.

  3. wow, no offense, but this is 100% incorrect… 80% of Twitter content is CREATED on various third-part apps, but the VAST majority of Twitter content is CONSUMED at Twitter.com.

  4. No offense taken, but how do people consume information in 140 character portions? I can see the argument that some people may FIND their data at Twitter, but the large, large majority of substantive Twitter posts are links to content elsewhere.Twitter is a lot closer to being the new RSS than the new CNN.

  5. wow, no offense, but this is 100% incorrect… 80% of Twitter content is CREATED on various third-part apps, but the VAST majority of Twitter content is CONSUMED at Twitter.com.

  6. No offense taken, but how do people consume information in 140 character portions? I can see the argument that some people may FIND their data at Twitter, but the large, large majority of substantive Twitter posts are links to content elsewhere.Twitter is a lot closer to being the new RSS than the new CNN.

Comments are closed.